Rebuke of Mark Mickelson from the UCG Chairman and President June 28, 2017

Update Aug 2018:   It turns out that the basic concept of Mark’s position  i.e. that Jesus was not the God of Mosaic Israel; has actually been adopted by UCG despite their disingenuous rejection of his paper in 2017.  See the 22 Aug 2018 News Blog item.

Follow up article here

The UCG Chairman and President have finally come out with a lightly veiled rebuke of Mark Mickelson and the heresy he is openly teaching; that the God of the Old Testament known to Israel was exclusively God the Father.  

Mark presented a Paper to the UCG Doctrinal Committee on the subject many months ago and has been actively teaching this gross error for well over a year.  I brought this to the attention of Don late last year and Mark’s heretical sermons were removed from the Spokane UCG website.  

In the past I have been critical of some things in UCG but in this case UCG is correct; both in the doctrine and in rebuking such unethical behavior.

See the Nov 2016 post Mark Mickelson Seeks Major Doctrinal  Change

It seems that in spite of the fact that the Doctrinal Committee will not approve this heresy and the fact that he was forced to remove his erroneous sermons from the Spokane UCG website,  Mark has continued to teach this gross error and a rebuke has now been  made in public.  This letter posted on the UCG website does not use Mark’s name but the stated subject is the exact false teaching that Mark is engaged in.  

The importance of this letter which is an apparent final warning in preparation to remove Mark from the CoE and Ministry if Mark does not desist, is underlined in its being signed by both the UCG Chairman and President 

To make matters worse; Mark, who has demonstrated such unethical conduct himself, is the Chairman of the UCG Ethics Committee.  

I wrote to Mark three times last year and when he did not respond I first confirmed with Aaron Dean that Mark had submitted the Paper and that the CoE would not approve Mark’s proposed doctrinal paper, and then sent Don Ward links to some of Mark’s sermons which sermons were quickly removed.

It is my understanding that Mark has been speaking about this to other congregations, some of whom may have posted some of these sermons, but I expect that this is also a more general warning to all elders to toe the line as well.

There are other elders with other different issues, some teaching the trinity etc.

Mark’s teaching is very close to the Ken Westby “One God Movement” 
so often featured in The Journal and championed by people like the Bosserman brothers [I have corresponded with Mark Bosserman in the past] in UCG as well as by Mark.

It is my understanding that a few hundred people have now been caught up in this heresy.

I cannot say exactly what is going to happen in the short term, they have been very patient with Mark until now [they also allow the Bosserman’s to remain in UCG]; but both president and chairman signing off on the letter is something new to me.

For a study on the subject of the Nature of God please visit our About God series at TheShiningLight School of Biblical Studies.


Chairman and President’s Letter

The purpose of this letter is to encourage all of us to continue to fight the good fight of faith and be settled in the faith. Here in the Northern Hemisphere we are now entering the long, hot summer, and it’s a time when there can be a let-down in our spiritual lives—as there are so many distractions in the world today. It is a time in which people travel, go on vacation and young people go to camp. All this is coupled with the perilous times in which are living.

It is also a time in which we can easily become lax in renewing the inward man on a daily basis. We often need to be reminded of the exhortation that the apostle Paul gave the Hebrews: “Therefore we must give the more earnest heed to the things we have heard, lest we drift away” Hebrews 2:1). We are committed to guarding those precious truths that God has revealed to us. And at the same time, we are admonished by the apostle Peter to grow in grace and in knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. We should always keep in mind that the Church of God is the pillar and ground of the truth (1 Timothy 3:15).

From time to time some brethren have become troubled by sermons or conversations in which they get the idea that the Church is going to change doctrine. So let’s be reminded of the process necessary for changing the official doctrine of the United Church of God (UCG). Even though there is a rigorous review process in place for sermons and articles that appear on our website or in our Church’s publications, some few sermons may not properly represent the official doctrine of the Church.

Some congregations are not as vigilant as they could be in monitoring sermons placed on their local church website. And some few sermons do not properly reflect the official doctrines of the Church. So let’s be reminded of the process necessary for changing the official doctrines of the Church.

Our ministry, and all who speak for UCG, should remember the teaching of the apostle Paul when he said an elder must “[hold] fast the faithful word as he has been taught” (Titus 1:9). Paul also said we are to “hold fast the pattern of sound words which you have heard from me, in faith and love which are in Christ Jesus” (2 Timothy 1:13). We have been entrusted with a sound doctrinal heritage. Our messages to God’s people should always be grounded in the truth of Scripture and the doctrinal teachings we hold.

When UCG was begun and its administrative structure was developed, a rigorous process was outlined to protect the core teachings of the Church. The Constitution of the United Church of God identifies 20 Fundamentals of Belief . They are listed in Article Two of the Constitution of the United Church God, an International Association .

At this time, we believe it would be helpful for all of us to briefly review our doctrine review process. And we hasten to add that we welcome the submission of doctrinal and prophecy papers from the ministry and the membership. We appreciate the interest by ministers and members to further advance our understanding of the Word of God.

We have a “Process for Submitting Doctrinal and Prophecy Papers” that was approved by the Council of Elders (CoE) on Aug. 132013. This clearly defined process is available to download via the “Download” link at the top of this page.

While we protect what we have agreed to, we want to make certain that any modifications to our current doctrines are done decently and in order. The forgoing policy lays out in a systematic way how ministers and members should go about submitting any paper. Here is an overview of the process to be followed by those who wish to submit papers—which must be done in writing and submitted electronically:

• Explain the traditional teaching of the Church.

• Show where the traditional teaching is wrong or lacking.

• Write what the correct teaching should be and why this is a more accurate understanding.

The path for approval is stated in the policy as first going through the local pastor and the regional pastor. If they believe the paper has merit, they will then submit it to the Doctrine Committee of the Council of Elders. There are also appeal provisions along the way so that no one is summarily cut off. This process continues to the Council of Elders and culminates with the final point of the process:

If the Council of Elders receives and approves by a two-thirds (⅔) ballot of the full Council a paper that would alter the current doctrine outside of the fundamental beliefs, it must be presented to the General Conference of Elders for consideration. The General Conference of Elders will be provided with 90days to study the paper and ask questions prior to being asked for a ballot. The paper must be approved by the General Conference of Elders, as prescribed by the governing documents of the Church.

As a reminder, an amendment to the Fundamentals of Belief requires the approval of three fourths all the elders of the GCE as it is constituted at the time of the ballot. So one can readily see that a rigorous review process is in place.

What is important is that any proposed changes be done in such a way that it honors the commitment of the Church to hold to biblical truth—while we continue to grow in grace and in knowledge. If there is a change to our agreed-upon beliefs, this process carefully vets the material in a scholarly manner while employing rules of hermeneutics that consider definitions of terms, context, usage, historical background, logic, precedent and other criteria.

It is very important that anyone submitting a paper should not be teaching his suggested changes until the paper is approved by the General Conference of Elders (GCE). The Church’s current belief stands throughout the process. To do otherwise creates confusion and division.

Do you understand what we teach regarding God the Father and Jesus Christ?

Some sermons have recently created confusion about the nature of God the Father and Jesus Christ. Do all of us fully understand what we believe and preach on this subject? How long has it been since you reviewed the study papers and other Church publications on the topic in question? In many cases it’s been too long. The nature of God and Christ was one of the topics of controversy that led to the formation of the United Church of God.

The questions surrounding the nature of God have been debated for centuries. The only valid source we have is the Bible. We must use sound principles of exegesis in reaching our conclusions. Below are resources that we encourage you to read and study deeply regarding the nature of God and Christ.

United Church of God Resources:

• Fundamental Belief One 
• “The Nature of God and Christ” study paper (August, 2005)
• Is God a Trinity? booklet
• Who Is God? booklet, chapter 6“Who Was Jesus?” 
• Jesus Christ: The Real Story booklet, chapter 2“Who—and What—Was Jesus Christ?”

It is our sincere desire that we be one in faith, hope, love and doctrine and that we are able to fulfill the great commission that God and Christ have called us to at this critical, crucial juncture in human history. God and Christ have promised never to leave us or forsake us in our quest to seek first the Kingdom of God.

Indeed, we are living in perilous times, and Satan the devil is walking about as a roaring lion seeking whom he may devour. So let us put on the whole armor of God and fight the good fight of faith, for we are not of those who draw back—but we are of those who are more than conquerors through God and Jesus Christ, who loves us and gave Himself for us.



Add a Comment
  1. I wonder if some UCG ministers knew this was coming. A Pastor in Oklahoma gave a lengthy sermon on “heresies” last Sabbath.

    I understand that a letter on this subject was sent to all elders before this letter was published. James

  2. James, you mentioned that “Mark presented a Paper to the UCG Doctrinal Committee.”

    Is that paper available for people to investigate or is United keeping such papers presented by ministry and brethren hidden away in secret?

    I do not believe that Papers under review are made available. You could try asking the Doctrinal Committee. Write the Council with: Attention Doctrinal Committee and ask therm.


  3. I find this letter to be somewhat confusing and astonishing because it talks about when ucg was formed a rigerous process was outlined to protect the core beliefs. How some congregations are not as vigilant as they should be in monitoring the sermons they post online. It clearly states that a rigerous review process exist’s in UCG to review articles and sermons that appear on ucg website.
    Then what happened with the rigerous review process for President Kubics Pentecost 2016 sermon ? What happened to the rigerous review program for the infamous white paper ? What happened to the rigerous review process for when Darris Mc Neely in a Beyond Today broadcast programme called the observering of Unleavened bread a celebration of Christ’resurrection.
    Hey I think this rigerous review program needs reviewing.

  4. @ Church member – excellent point. “Some congregations are not as vigilant as they could be in monitoring sermons placed on their local church website.” As if these sermons are simply put there anonymously. Who is doing the posting? Milford. Milford starting taking control over local church websites in 2013 after Victor Kubik became their President and they began further centralizing & consolidating control. Sounds to me like passing the buckaroo royale. Why UCGers put up with it is beyond me. How is this not the same thing that happened in the 1970’s? A Doctrinal Committtee, scholars taking over with a Systematic Theology Project … Those who don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.